Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA logo with link NPA logo with link

About this NPA


The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or referrals from the High Court of Australia, in its capacity as the Court of Disputed Returns, pursuant to s 329 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments


  • 7 Feb 2023: Duma v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2023] FCA 47
    DEFAMATION - series of feature articles by two journalists about corruption in Papua New Guinea (PNG) - where articles related to grant of petroleum licence, activities of an ASX-listed company and PNG cabinet minister - where Minister alleged articles conveyed imputations that he had acted corruptly and illegally in several respects - whether one …
    Judge: Katzmann J
  • 1 Feb 2023: Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2023] FCA 38
    DEFAMATION - defamation proceeding brought by former commander of special forces "November Platoon" - determination of separate questions as to meaning - news articles, television broadcast and radio broadcast concerning conduct of November Platoon in Afghanistan in 2012 - where pleaded imputations concern investigation, suspicion and guilt,…
    Judge: Lee J
  • 27 Jan 2023: Landrey v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 27
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for extension of limitation period to commence action in defamation - whether not reasonable in circumstances for applicant to have commenced action - where criminal proceedings brought against applicant - application refused on a review of all the circumstances of the case
    Judge: Lee J
  • 9 Jan 2023: Kumova v Davison (No 2) [2023] FCA 1
    DEFAMATION - proceeding brought by Australian investor against "Stock Swami" Twitter personality - seventeen imputations alleged to have been conveyed by six tweets - where tweets alleged applicant had engaged in insider trading, "pumping and dumping" of securities and other market misconduct - all seventeen imputations carried - where parts of…
    Judge: Lee J
  • 16 Dec 2022: Gill v HarperCollins Publishers Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1533
    DEFAMATION - applicant sought to have certain particulars in respondents' amended defence struck out or pleaded with further specificity - whether some impugned pleadings are too vague, imprecise or ambiguous - whether some pleading particulars are improper - where applicant must prove that the pleadings could not be pleaded and attempted to be…
    Judge: Bromwich J

Practice Notes


Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees


Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:

Forms:
Rules:

Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.

Resources


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:

Subscribe


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions

National Coordinating Judges

  • Rares J (Defamation)
  • Lee J (Defamation)
  • Wheelahan J (Defamation)
NPA Judges

Was this page useful?

What did you like about it?

How can we make it better?